Log in | Create Account
Home :: Catalogs :: Forum :: Groups :: Members :: FAQ :: Testimonials :: Contact

View Catalog Item

Question:
Abc is migrating its financial systems from a host-based legacy system, to a webbased
system. Abc will perform all order processing on the new system. The
system implementation is scheduled to coincide with the start of their new fiscal
year. If the implementation does not go live on the target data, the effect on the
business will be catastrophic. During the pilot, several defects in the user
interface were identified. Although not critical to the system's performance,
several high profile users as well as one of the key stakeholders, have repeatedly
complained about the defect. The team fears that there are more cosmetic
defects, because they did not have resources to perform a full suite of usage tests.
the project team has identified the following risks: Condition: more non-critical
cosmetic defects exist in the user interface, but have not been discovered
Consequence: desired user satisfaction levels will not be achieved The team rates
impact on a scale of one through three. What assesses the states risk, and is
consistent with the MSF Risk Management recommendations for risk
assessment?
A. Probability: 10%
Impact: 1
Exposure: 0.1
B. Probability: 10%
Impact: 1
Exposure: 11
C. Probability: 10%
Impact: Red.
Exposure: Low
D. Probability: 65%
Impact: 3
Exposure: 68
E. Probability: 65%
Impact: Yellow
Exposure: Medium
F. Probability: 85%
Impact: 1
Exposure: 0.85
# 10
Answer: F
Answer Explanation

The probability of this risk is almost certain haunch 85%, the impact of the risk will just
be a lose of customer satisfaction but the product will still function so a 1 for impact,
multiply the two together and you get exposure of .85. Microsoft White Pages

Marked for review: No
Comments for review:

74-100 Microsoft Solution Framework (MSF) Practitioner